WINC WHITEPAPER
  • πŸ“š1.0 Abstract
  • πŸ’‘2.0 Manifesto
  • ❓3.0 Problem Overview
  • ⁉️4.0 Criteria for a solution
  • πŸ—οΈ5.0 Features and functions of Winc
  • πŸ’±6.0 Economics: Structural dynamics of Winc’s economic system
  • πŸŽ‡6.1 Value proposition for sports bettors
  • 🦯6.2 Value proposition for holders of WΔ°NC
  • πŸ’Ώ6.3 Value proposition for the sports betting industry
  • πŸ“€6.4 Value to investors
  • βš–οΈ7.0 Betting Engine & Technical Architecture
  • ⚽7.1 Head to Head Betting Process
  • 🀹7.2 Multi User betting
  • ⛓️7.3 Peerless Direct Chain betting
  • βš’οΈ7.4 Creating and Resolving events
  • ⏲️7.5 Time Related Conditions (Atomic Pairing)
  • 🀺7.6 Activating an Oracle Masternode
  • πŸ“½οΈ7.7 Promotion queue
  • πŸ“Ό7.8 Demotion
  • βš–οΈ7.9 Governance
    • πŸ“‡7.9.1 Payout dispute
    • πŸ“”7.9.2 Penalized nodes
    • πŸ““7.9.3 Oracle Masternode voting
    • πŸ“°7.9.4 Potential network threats
  • 🏈8.0 Sports data Feeds
  • ⛓️8.1 Network Add-ons & Enhancements
  • 🐌8.2 Scalability
  • πŸ’²8.3 Fee Structure
  • πŸ…8.4 Supported Leagues
  • πŸ’Ή9.0 TOKENOMICS
  • πŸ›£οΈ9.1 ROADMAP
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. 7.9 Governance

7.9.2 Penalized nodes

If a node continues to submit match data that falls out of consensus after they have been demoted in the past, the Oracle network can vote to penalize the node of any of the fees collected since its promotion. The network recovers these coins via the collateralized coins via 90% supermajority vote in the terms of the smart contract.

Previous7.9.1 Payout disputeNext7.9.3 Oracle Masternode voting

Last updated 1 year ago

βš–οΈ
πŸ“”